Cardiovascular Journal of Africa - Important Information for Reviewers
Cardiovascular Journal of Africa
cardiovascular journal of africa on twitter
BUY / PURCHASE / PAY ONLINE  •  SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT  •  LINKS  •  CONTACT US  •  LOGIN (VIA SABINET)
 
  
Login via Sabinet
Journal Archive Access
Subscribe to the printed journal
Subscribe to the online journal
Submit a manuscript / letter
New content alerts (Free)
Search Website
Order Reprints
Copyright Clearance
Instructions for Authors
Customers / Advertisers
Institutions / Libraries
For your patients
Reviewers
Have question?
CVJAfrica Information
Conference Calendar
Editorial Profile
Photo Gallery
Contact Us
Online Journal (eJournal)
Media Resources
Chronic Heart Failure Guide
Online Media
Follow us on Twitter
 
cardiovascular journal of africa on the ipad
iPad compatible version
can be now be downloaded
 
 
pascar
 
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

SCImago Journal & Country Rank
 
crossref member
 
sabinet african journal archive
 
The African Journal Archive is a retrospective digitisation project of full-text journal articles published in Africa. Older CVJA articles can be viewed here.
 

IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR REVIEWERS

The concept of reviewing is essential for maintaining quality in science publications. It is a voluntary task accepted by the scientific community as being in its overall best interest.

However, some academic institutions give credit to reviewers who do this task for international, PubMed-listed Journals. Should you require confirmation of a review done for the Cardiovascular Journal of Africa, please e-mail Elsabé on

For your guidance, the major attributes of our requirements for a review are:

  1. To focus on the content of the article not language usage, as this is dealt with by our language editors. However you may wish to indicate areas requiring improvement.
  2. To reflect on whether the article content contributes to the development of knowledge about cardiovascular disease. Also whether it has value for the clinicians practicing in Africa and other developing regions.
  3. To evaluate whether the conclusions made are substantiated by the evidence presented and should be further researched.
  4. Please indicate your evaluation as required using the grading system where 1 is the highest ranked level; descending to 2,3 4 and 5.
  5. This is the link to our Manuscript Submission System
Website Development by Design Connection
© 2011 All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer