Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  27 / 78 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 27 / 78 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 30, No 1, January/February 2019

AFRICA

25

poverty appear to be a major concern in South African rural

areas, including Ellisras.

14

Details of the Ellisras Longitudinal Study (ELS) research

design and sampling procedure have been reported elsewhere.

15,16

For the purpose of this analysis, a total of 742 young adults aged

22 to 30 years (365 females and 377 males), who were part of the

ELS, participated in this survey.

The ethics committee of the University of the North, now

known as the University of Limpopo, granted approval prior to

the survey. Participants read and signed informed consent forms.

All subjects went through a series of anthropometric

measurements based on the standard procedures recommended

by the International Society for the Advancement of

Kinanthropometry (ISAK).

17

Skinfold (triceps, biceps,

subscapular and supraspinale) and height were measured using

both the Martin anthropometer and SlimGuide skinfold calliper.

Height was rounded off to the nearest 0.1 cm and skinfolds were

measured three times, where the values were rounded off to the

nearest 0.1 mm. A flexible steel tape was used to measure WC in

centimetres as participants assumed a standing position. WC was

measured sideways from midway between the lowest portion of

the rib cage and iliac crest and anteriorly, midway between the

xiphoid process of the sternum and the umbilicus.

Measurements for both systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood

pressure (DBP) were taken at least three times with the electronic

Micronta monitoring kit at an interval of five minutes, after

the participants had been sitting for at least 15 minutes in a

well-ventilated room.

18,19

The device contained an infrasonic

transducer that keeps records of BP and pulse rate on the

display screen. The device has been used for research and clinical

purposes.

20

Readings taken with a conventional mercury

sphygmomanometer and an automated device showed a high

correlation (

r

=

0.93), based on a pilot study conducted before

the actual survey.

Readings for intra- and inter-tester technical errors of

measurement (% TEM) for height, skinfolds and WC ranged

from 0.04 to 4.16 cm (0.2–5.01%), 0.2 to 6 mm (0.4–6.8%) and 0

to 3.4 cm (0–4%), respectively.

12

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics for WC, WHR and skinfold thickness

were computed. Independent

t

-tests were calculated to examine

whether there were any significant gender differences in the

participants’ anthropometric and haemodynamic measurements.

Hypertension was defined as SBP

140 mmHg or DBP

90

mmHg, according to WHO.

21

Central obesity was assessed based

on WC and WHR as follows: WC in men

102 cm and in women

88 cm, and WHR

0.5 cm in both men and women.

22

The

sum of four skinfold measurements (triceps, biceps, subscapular

and supraspinale), categorised as above the 85th percentile, was

used to determine general obesity, where young adults were

characterised as normal or excessively fat.

23

The association between BP, WHR, WC and skinfolds,

adjusted for age and gender, was assessed using a linear

regression model. The risk of developing hypertension among

young Ellisras adults who were obese or overweight was assessed

with multinomial logistic regression analysis. Data were analysed

using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS)

(version 23), with the level of significance set at

p

<

0.05.

Results

Table 1 presents descriptive statistics for anthropometric

parameters, skinfolds and BP among young Ellisras adults aged

22 to 30 years. Women showed significantly (

p

<

0.05) higher

mean average WC (82.49

±

14.73 cm) than men (74.74

±

9.56 cm)

(

p

<

0.000). Men showed a significantly higher mean SBP (125.33

±

2.60 mmHg) than women (114.32

±

10.23 mmHg).

Presented in Table 2 are the summary data on the prevalence

of hypertension, overweight and central obesity among the

participants as evaluated using anthropometric parameters (WC,

WHR and skinfold thickness). There was a higher significant (

p

<

0.000) prevalence of central obesity in women (69.6%) than

in men (1.4%), while the prevalence of overweight was higher

in men (15.4%) than women (15.1%), although not significant.

High SBP was significantly (

p

<

0.05) more prevalent in men

(14.0%) than in women (1.9%).

Table 3 indicates the Pearson correlation coefficients

between anthropometric parameters, skinfold thickness and

BP measurements. There were significant (

p

<

0.05) correlations

Table 2. Prevalence of central obesity, overweight and hypertension

among young rural Ellisras adults

Variable

Men,

n

(%)

Women,

n

(%)

p

-value*

High WC

5 (1.4)

134 (35.4)

0.000

High WHR

110 (30.2)

263 (69.6)

0.000

Overweight

56 (15.4)

57 (15.1)

0.142

High SBP

51 (14.0)

7 (1.9)

0.013

High DBP

11 (3.0)

9 (2.4)

0.312

Hypertension

8 (2.2)

5 (1.3)

0.003

WC, waist circumference; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; SBP, systolic blood pres-

sure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.

Table 3. Pearson’s correlation coefficient between blood pressure and

anthropometric parameters (skinfold thickness,WC andWHR)

Variable

Triceps

Biceps

Subscapular Supraspinale WHR Waist

Women

SBP 0.022** 0.021** 0.053**

0.140

0.175 0.237

DBP 0.046** 0.007** 0.013**

0.093

0.136 0.684

Men

SBP 0.012** 0.015** 0.120

0.016

0.231 0.303

DBP 0.059

0.017** 0.054**

0.068

0.171 0.211

**Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).

SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.

Table 1. Descriptive statistics for anthropometric parameters, skinfold

thickness and blood pressure among young Ellisras adults

Variable

Men (

n

=

364) Women (

n

=

375)

p

-value

Age, years

25.44

±

2.60

25.52

±

2.53

0.636

SBP, mmHg

125.33

±

12.95 114.32

±

10.23* 0.000

DBP, mmHg

71.67

±

10.11

69.43

±

9.12*

0.002

Biceps skinfold, cm

3.62

±

2.10

10.70

±

6.44*

0.000

Triceps skinfold, cm

6.46

±

4.30

12.41

±

7.20*

0.000

Subscapular skinfold, cm 8.71

±

3.28

12.59

±

6.80*

0.000

Supraspinale skinfold, cm 5.11

±

3.57

12.34

±

7.19*

0.000

Waist-to-height ratio

0.434

±

0.082

0.509

±

0.122* 0.000

Waist circumference, cm 74.74

±

9.56*

82.49

±

14.73* 0.000

Mean

±

SD; *

p

<

0.05.

SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.