Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  71 / 78 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 71 / 78 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 26, No 4, July/August 2015

AFRICA

e17

the cerebral vascular bed was affected, adverse neurological

events were reported in 5–10% of cases.

4

As in our case, when

the subclavian artery was affected, asymmetric upper extremity

blood pressures occurred.

5

When the spinal canal and peripheral

nerves are affected, symptoms such as paresis and plegia occur.

6

One of the most important factors in making a diagnosis of

aortic dissection is a high index of suspicion. Usually physical

examination leads to a diagnosis of suspicion. Hypertension is

either the main reason for dissection or it develops secondary to

severe pain. Hypotension is an important finding of tamponade

or coronary flow impairment.

Since chest pain was followed by unconsciousness in the

history of our patient with hypertension, our pre-diagnosis

was aortic dissection. Absence of a left radial pulse on physical

examination strengthened the diagnosis of aortic dissection.

Absence of flow in the left common carotid and subclavian

artery was confirmed with CT angiography. TEE revealed that

the absence of flow was due to intimo–intimal intussusception.

During surgery, it was observed that the cause of occlusion was

a dissection flap prolapsing into the aortic arch.

Suspicion of a diagnosis of intimo-intimal intussusception is

life saving. On CT angiography, the intimal flap, false lumen and

crescent sign in the ascending aorta observed in DeBakey type

I and type II aortic dissections are absent in these patients. As

in our case, a filling defect may be determined in the aortic arch

by prolapsing of the intima (Fig. 1). ‘False occlusions’ may be

observed in the vascular structures of the brain and extremities.

Delay in treatment causes transformation of the occlusion to

a ‘real occlusion’.

7

There was no evidence of dissection of the

ascending aorta in our case. TEE confirmed the haematoma in

the distal part of the ascending aorta and motion of the intimal

flap towards the ascending aorta during diastole.

Lajevardi

et al

. and Nohara

et al

. reported that the proximal

part of the circumferential dissection in the ascending aorta

occluded the coronary ostia and caused severe aortic valve

insufficiency by entering the aortic valve.

3,8

Aortic valve

insufficiency due to a dissection flap is present in 60–70% of

type I dissections.

9

This condition occurs with three mechanisms

of action: (1) central regurgitation due to annular dilation,

(2) distortion of aortic root geometry due to prolapse of the

dissection across a leaflet, (3) annulus rupture or tearing of one

of the leaflets.

10

Sometimes aortic valve insufficiency can be the only finding

suggestive of dissection of the ascending aorta in patients

without symptoms of dissection.

10

In our case, aortic valve

insufficiency was considered to be due to annular dilation. Cases

resulting in a fatal outcome due to occlusion in the coronary

ostia during diastole, caused by the proximal part of the

dissection flap, have also been reported.

3

Myocardial infarction

is seen at a rate of 1–2% in aortic dissections.

11

The dissection flap in the coronary ostia can be seen during

angiography, with a diagnosis of coronary syndrome, as in our

case.

11

A diagnosis of aortic dissection must be excluded in acute

coronary syndrome, otherwise antiplatelet and anticoagulant

therapy may have fatal outcomes. Angiography was also

performed in our case, with a diagnosis of acute coronary

syndrome. Not being able to advance the angiography catheter

into the aortic arch and determination of the false lumen caused

a misdiagnosis of type III aortic dissection. Since angiography

could not be completed, the coronary ostia could not be seen.

During surgery, we determined that the coronary ostia were

occluded by the distal part of the dissection flap during diastole.

In the literature, cases have frequently been reported of patients

misdiagnosed with type III aortic dissection when the dissection

flap was not observed in the ascending aorta.

12

Where other diagnostic methods are insufficient in the

diagnosis, TEE may be helpful, as the motion of the dissection

flap invaginated in the aortic arch can be observed. Due tomotion

of the proximal part of the dissection flap toward the ventricle,

it may be observed that it causes aortic valve insufficiency.

TEE is considered to be the reference investigation with 98%

sensitivity.

8,12

TEE was also the most powerful diagnostic method

in our case.

Conclusion

Intimo–intimal intussusception is a rare complication of aortic

dissection. However, it may be severe or fatal due to its effect

on the cerebral and peripheral vascular structures in the distal

part of the ascending aorta, and its effect on the coronary

arteries and aortic valve in the proximal part of the ascending

aorta.

It should definitely be considered in elderly patients with

hypertension in the presence of chest pain and unconsciousness.

TEE is the chosen investigative method with high sensitivity

and specificity in the diagnosis.

It is important for a differential

diagnosis during the pre-operative period and for determination

of intra-operative treatment strategy.

References

1.

Von bostroem E. Das geheilte aneurysma dissecans.

Deut Arch Klin Med

1887;

42

: 1.

2.

Hufnagel CA, Conrad PW. Intimo-intimal intussusception in dissecting

aneurysms.

Am J Surg

1962;

103:

727–731. PMID: 14449761.

3.

Lajevardi SS, Sian K, Ward M, Marshman D. Circumferential intimal

tear in type A aortic dissection with intimo-intimal intussusception

into left ventricle and left main coronary artery occlusion

J Thorac

Cardiovasc Surg

2012;

144

: 21–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.05.010.

4.

Goldberg SP, Sanders C, Nanda NC, Holman WL. Aortic dissection

with intimal intussusception: diagnosis and management.

J Cardiovasc

Surg (Torino).

2000;

41

: 613–615. PMID: 11052292.

5.

Neri E, Capannini G, Carone E, Tucci E, Diciolla F, Sassi C. The

missing flap: consideration about a case of aortic intussusception.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

1999;

117

: 829–830. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-

5223(99)70309-0.

6.

Khan IA, Nair CK. Clinical, diagnosis, and management perspec-

tives of aortic dissection.

Chest

2002;

122

: 311–328. DOI:10.1378/

chest.122.1.311.

7.

Reitknecht FL, Bhayana JN, Lajos TZ Circumferential intimal tear

causing obstruction of the aortic arch: an unusual complication of

aortic dissection

Ann Thorac Surg

1988;

46

: 100–101. PMID: 3289513

8.

Nohara H, Shida T, Mukohara N, Nakagiri K, Matsumori M, Ogawa

K. Aortic regurgitation secondary to back-and-forth intimal flap move-

ment of acute type A dissection.

Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

2004;

10

:

54–56. PMID:15008702

9.

Fann JI, Glower DD, Miller DC, Yun KL, Rankin JS, White WD,

et al

.

Preservation of aortic valve in type A aortic dissection complicated by

aortic regurgitation.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

1991;

102

: 62–73. PMID:

2072730.

10. Lijoi A, Scarano F, Canale C, Parodi E, Dottori V, Passerone GC,

et al.