Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  11 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 30, No 3, May/June 2019

AFRICA

139

circumferences, peak height velocity and skeletal age),

cardiovascular measurements (blood pressure, cholesterol levels,

arterial stiffness) and lung function measurements (FEV

1

), motor

performance fitness tests (muscle strength, speed, co-ordination,

endurance) and psychosocial tests (personality traits, sociometric

status) have been described previously in detail.

3-5

Aerobic fitness was measured with a maximal running test

on a treadmill with continuous measurement of oxygen uptake

(VO

2 peak

).

6

There after a six-minute sub-maximal running test at

a speed of 8 km/h and increasing slope of 0, 2.5 and 5% was

recorded. After a short rest, running was continued at the same

constant speed of 8 km/h while the slope was increased every two

minutes by 2.5 or 5%, depending on the heart rate. This maximal

test was continued until complete exhaustion had been reached.

7

The bone mineral content was measured in the hip, lumbar

spine and wrist with dual X-ray absorptiometry. The BMD was

measured on each side.

8,9

Obesity was estimated with body mass index (BMI) from

body mass and body height squared. Fatness was calculated

from the sum of four skinfolds (S4S) from the biceps, triceps,

sub-scapular and iliocristal skinfolds.

10

All the participants (and their parents) in the study received

and signed the informed consent prior to and during this

longitudinal research.

Statistical analysis

The statistical methods used in this study are described in detail

elsewhere.

3-5

Briefly, four variables (VO

2 peak

, BMD, obesity from

BMI, and body fatness from S4S), measured 10 times over a

period of 25 years, were included in the analysis. The general

estimated equation and random coefficient analysis were suitable

to answer all the research questions and were much more flexible

than MANOVA for repeated measurements. All analyses were

carried out with the Statistical Package of Social Science, 10.1

for Windows (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, III, USA). The level of

significant was set at

p

<

0.05.

Results and Discussion

Data on both aerobic fitness and daily physical activity were

gathered nine times. A multilevel auto-regression analysis

revealed paradoxical results (Table 3). From the results, it can

Table 1. Presentation of measurements taken in the

AGAHLS subjects over time from 1977 to 2006

Years

1977–

1980 1985 1991 1993

1996/

97 2000 2006

Age in years

13–16 21 27 29 32 36 42

Body fatness

Dexa scan

× ×

Skinfold measurements

× × × × × × ×

Body mass index

× × × × × × ×

Waist-to-hip ratio

× × × × × × ×

Birth weight (retrospective)

× ×

Physical activity and fitness

Maximal oxygen uptake (direct test) × × × ×* × × ×*

Motor fitness (MOPER)

× × × × × × ×

Muscle strength (quadriceps/

hamstrings)

× × × × ×

Lung function

× × × × × × ×

Physical activity (accelerometer)

×

×

Physical activity (interview)

× × × × × × ×

Sedentary behaviour (questionnaire)

× × × × ×

Postural sway

×

Cardiovascular health

Traditional blood markers

(lipoproteins, triglycerides)

× × × × × × ×

Markers of inflammation and

endothelial function

× ×

Systolic/diastolic blood pressure

× × × × × × ×

Macrovascular function (carotid

ultrasound)

× ×

Microvascular function (nailfold

capillaroscopy)

×

Lifestyle

Demographic information

(questionnaire)

× × × × × × ×

Geographic mobility (interview)

×

Dietary intake (questionnaire)

× × ×

× × ×

Smoking (questionnaire; dipstick

in 2000)

× × ×

× × ×

Alcohol consumption

(questionnaire or interview)

× × × × × × ×

Coffee consumption (questionnaire)

× × × × ×

TV and computer usage

(questionnaire)

× × ×

Life rhythm (questionnaire)

× × ×

Sports motivation

×

×

Bone mineral density and osteoporosis

DEXA scan

×

× ×

Heel bone (ultrasound)

×

×

Lumbar spine (X-ray)

×

× ×

Distal radius and femoral head

(X-ray)

×

Musculoskeletal health complaints

(questionnaire)

× × × × × × ×

Skeletal age (X-ray)

×

*For VO

2

max in 1993 and 2006, this was sub-maximal performance

Table 2. A flow chart of the number of participants from the

two schools per year of measurement; school 1 is the

longitudinal school and school 2 the cross-sectional school

Year

School 1

Total

School 2

1976

340

410

70

1977

259

322

63

1978

251

321

70

1979

238

312

74

1985

200

200

1991

182

182

1993

166

166

1996

236

438

202

2000

213

378

165

2006

192

344

152

Table 3. Standardised regression coefficients (beta) and

p

-values obtained by generalised estimating equations (GEE)

regarding the longitudinal relationship between daily

physical activity on one hand and VO

2max

on the other hand

VO

2max

Analysis

β

p

-value

Crude

0.09

<

0.01

Adjusted 1

0.08

<

0.01

Adjusted 2

0.07

<

0.01

Crude: univariate analysis (corrected for gender time and initial value of

VO

2max

).

Adjusted 1: multiple analysis also corrected for lifestyle parameters.

Adjusted 2: multiple analysis also corrected for biological parameters.