Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  14 / 70 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 / 70 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 30, No 5, September/October 2019

256

AFRICA

elevated pulmonary pressure were shown to predict pre-operative

mortality rate.

Similarly, we found no difference in the peri-operative and

postoperative outcomes between HIV-positive and -negative

patients. At the six-week follow-up visit, most patients in our

series showed significant improvement in NYHA class (

p

0.001) (Table 3), with improvement of at least one functional

class to NYHA I (78.6%) and II (21%). This finding is consistent

with reports by Mutyaba

et al

.

2

and Tetty

et al

.

20

Furthermore,

ejection fraction was preserved in both HIV-positive and

-negative subjects.

Although our in-hospital peri-operative mortality rate of 5.7%

is higher than the 3.7% reported by Fennel

et al

.

12

in the pre-HIV

era, it is consistent with the majority of series worldwide.

6,9,11-14,18

It is much lower than the 14% mortality rate found by Mutyaba

et al

.

2

in their series, possibly because our HIV-positive patients

were virally suppressed on treatment.

Peri-operative complications in our study appeared to be more

common in HIV-positive patients undergoing pericardiectomy.

Furthermore, complete pericardiectomy was less likely to be

achieved in HIV-positive (

n

=

9, 50%) compared to -negative

patients (

n

=

37, 71%). Whether this was due to the inflammatory

process, with greater anatomical distortion making surgery more

difficult, is not clear.

Study limitations

Our study has limitations related to its retrospective design,

including a number of patients who were lost to follow up

while awaiting surgical pericardiectomy. We were able to obtain

survival status in most patients and were able to show that a

number of subjects died while awaiting surgery. Furthermore,

long-term patient follow up was often not possible because many

patients were from rural areas and had difficulty in accessing

the clinic. Based on the available patient records we could only

accurately comment on in-patient peri-operative mortality rate

and the early six-week follow-up visit after surgery. Furthermore,

in this study the diagnosis of constriction was made clinically and

supported by echocardiographic findings. Although Doppler

echocardiographic parameters (restrictive pattern) to confirm

pericardial constriction were not measured, the diagnosis was

confirmed in all subjects who underwent surgery for pericardial

constriction.

Conclusion

The findings of this study have important clinical implications.

Without surgery, constrictive pericarditis is associated with a

high mortality rate. Our study emphasises the benefits of surgery

in patients who do not respond to anti-tuberculous therapy.

Over a third of patients with constriction are HIV-positive in a

developing country. Although HIV infection is associated with

a higher in-hospital complication rate, peri-operative mortality

rate is unaffected in subjects who are on antiretroviral treatment

and are virologically suppressed.

References

1.

Ling LH, Oh JK, Schaff HV, Danielson GK, Mahoney DW, Seward

JB,

et al

. Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: evolving clinical

spectrum and impact on outcome after pericardiectomy.

Circulation

1999;

100

(13): 1380–1386.

2.

Mutyaba AK, Balkaran S, Cloete R, du Plessis N, Badri M, Brink J,

et al

. Constrictive pericarditis requiring pericardiectomy at Groote

Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa: Causes and perioperative

outcomes in the HIV era (1990–2012).

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

2014;

148

(6): 3058–65.e1.

3.

Nishimura RA. Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: a diagnostic

dilemma.

Heart

2001;

86

(6): 619–623.

4.

Maisch B, Seferovi PM, Risti AD, Erbel R, Rienmüller R, Adler Y,

et

al

. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases

executive summary. The task force on the diagnosis and management of

pericardial diseases of the European Society of Cardiology.

Eur Heart

J

2004;

25

(7): 587–610.

5.

Myers RB, Spodick DH. Constrictive pericarditis: clinical and patho-

physiologic characteristics.

Am Heart J

1999;

138

(2 Pt 1): 219–232.

6.

Bertog SC, Thambidorai SK, Parakh K, Schoenhagen P, Ozduran V,

Houghtaling PL,

et al.

Constrictive pericarditis: etiology and cause-

specific survival after pericardiectomy.

J Am Coll Cardiol

2004;

43

(8):

1445–1452.

7.

Khandaker MH, Espinosa RE, Nishimura RA, Sinak LJ, Hayes SN,

Melduni RM,

et al.

Pericardial disease: diagnosis and management.

Mayo Clin Proc

2010;

85

(6): 572–593.

8.

Syed FF, Schaff HV, Oh JK. Constrictive pericarditis – a curable dias-

tolic heart failure.

Nat Rev Cardiol

2014;

11

(9): 530–544.

9.

Bozbuga N, Erentug V, Eren E, Erdogan HB, Kirali K, Antal A,

et al

.

Pericardiectomy for chronic constrictive tuberculous pericarditis: risks

and predictors of survival.

Texas Heart Inst J

2003;

30

(3): 180–185.

10. Ç, nar B, Enç Y, Göksel O, Çimen S, Ketenci B,

et al

. Chronic constric-

tive tuberculous pericarditis: risk factors and outcome of pericardiec-

tomy.

Int J Tuberculosis Lung Dis

2006;

10

(6): 701–706.

11. Chowdhury UK, Subramaniam GK, Kumar AS, Airan B, Singh R,

Talwar S,

et al

. Pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis: a clinical,

echocardiographic, and hemodynamic evaluation of two surgical tech-

niques.

A Thorac Surg

2006;

81

(2): 522–529.

12. Fennell WM. Surgical treatment of constrictive tuberculous pericarditis.

Sth Afr Med J

1982;

62

(11): 353–355.

13. Zhu P, Mai M, Wu R, Lu C, Fan R, Zheng S. Pericardiectomy

for constrictive pericarditis: single-center experience in China.

J

Cardiothorac Surg

2015;

10

(1): 34.

14. Szabó G, Schmack B, Bulut C, Soós P, Weymann A, Stadtfeld S,

et

al

. Constrictive pericarditis: risks, aetiologies and outcomes after total

pericardiectomy: 24 years of experience.

Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg

2013;

44

(6): 1023–1028.

15. Kang SH, Song JM, Kim M, Choo SJ, Chung CH, Kang DH,

et al.

Prognostic predictors in pericardiectomy for chronic constrictive peri-

carditis.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

2014;

147

(2): 598–605.

16. Mayosi BM, Burgess LJ, Doubell AF. Tuberculous pericarditis.

Circulation

2005;

112

(23): 3608–3616.

17. Abubakar U, Adeoye PO, Adebo OA, Adegboye VO, Kesieme EB,

Okonta EK. Pattern of pericardial diseases in HIV-positive patients

at University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.

Sth Afr J HIV Med

2011;

12

(2).

18. Gopaldas RR, Dao TK, Caron NR, Markley JG. Predictors of

in-hospital complications after pericardiectomy: nationwide outcomes

study.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

2012;

145

(5): 1227–1233.

19. Strang JI. Tuberculous pericarditis in Transkei.

Clin Cardiol

1984;

7

(12):

667–670.

20. Tettey M, Sereboe L, Aniteye E, Edwin F, Kotei D, Tamatey M,

et al

.

Surgical management of constrictive pericarditis

. Ghana Med J

2007;