Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  7 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 26, No 6, November/December 2015

AFRICA

205

H-FABP is released from the myocardium into the circulation

within one to three hours of myocardial injury. Its concentration

in the blood peaks within six to eight hours and decreases within

24 to 30 hours.

10

Its properties of being abundantly available

in myocardial tissue, intra-cytosolic dominancy, relative tissue

specificity, and early elevation in blood and urine after AMI

suggest that H-FABP may be used in the early diagnosis of

ACS.

11,12

Its plasma kinetics and secretion are similar to that

of myoglobin, therefore, it is used as a marker for the early

diagnosis of ACS.

13

There are few studies on this topic and the results of previous

studies are controversial.

14-19

In our study, we aimed to evaluate

the diagnostic effectiveness of H-FABP in the early diagnosis

of NSTEMI and to compare it with other cardiac markers,

including CK-MB and troponin I (TnI) levels.

Methods

Forty-eight patients who were admitted to the emergency

department within the first 12 hours of onset of ischaemic-type

chest pain lasting for longer than 30 minutes, and who did not

have ST-segment elevation on ECG, were included in the study.

The patients who had newly developed left bundle branch block,

who were admitted more than 12 hours after the onset of chest

pain, who had chronic renal failure, chronic muscular diseases

or heart failure, or who had recently experienced trauma,

musculoskeletal injury or shock, were excluded from the study.

A detailed medical history was obtained from each patient

and a physical examination was performed. Twelve-lead ECGs

were obtained and the changes were recorded. A complete

blood count, biochemical tests and urgent cardiac profiles

(CK-MB mass, myoglobin and TnI levels) were obtained from

venous blood. Bedside H-FABP level was also determined

from the same blood sample. The patients were monitored for

24 hours, and urgent cardiac profiles and ECG monitoring

were performed every six hours. NSTEMI was diagnosed in 24

patients as the result of 24-hour follow up, and the remaining 24

patients did not develop MI.

The blood samples were immediately sent to the biochemistry

laboratory of our hospital to measure TnI and CK-MB levels.

Blood was taken in a 5-cm

3

plain tube and centrifuged at

3 000 rpm for 10 minutes. The serum was separated and loaded

into a Beckman Coulter Access II device and analysed with

chemiluminescence. Measurement of the cardiac markers in each

sample was completed within 30 to 45 minutes. The reference

values of the cardiac markers were

<

0.04 ng/ml for TnI (

<

0.04

μ

g/l) and 0.6–6.3 ng/ml for CK-MB (0.6–6.3

μ

g/l).

All patients were also tested with the CardioDetect

®

(Med-Rennessens, Niemcy, Poland) H-FABP immunotest. It

is a rapid chromatographic immunoassay method designed for

qualitative determination of H-FABP levels in blood samples.

Three to four drops of capillary blood were dropped onto a

CardioDetect kit and left on a flat surface for 15 minutes. Double

lines were interpreted as positive, a single line was negative, and

no lines was interpreted as inadequate material. H-FABP

>

7

μ

g/l

was seen as positive in this test.

20

H-FABP was tested only once

in each patient, as the number of kits was limited.

TnI and/or CK-MB elevation (verified with at least two

different measurements) associated with ischaemic-type chest

pain for over 30 minutes and without persistent ST-segment

elevation was accepted as NSTEMI, regardless of ECG change,

as recommended by the ESC/ACC committee.

6

Statistical analysis

All data were transferred to the SPSS 10.0 statistics program.

The Student’s

t

-test was used for a comparison of the groups

when parametric assumptions were realised, and the chi-square

and Fisher’s exact tests were used as a comparison and an

association of the categorical data, respectively. Screening test

results are also given. A

p

-value of

<

0.05 was considered

statistically significant.

For calculation of sample size, as a guideline we used the

results of a study conducted by Ruzgar

et al

.,

21

in which a

sensitivity of tnI and H-FABP was 0.38 and 0.95, respectively.

However, in order to be more conservative, sample size was

calculated based on a sensitivity of tnI of 0.38, sensitivity of

H-FABP of 0.8, pre-test probability of 0.6, power of 0.8, and

type 1 error rate of 0.05 (with 95% confidence). We found the

required sample size to be 43, and our study group consisted of

48 people.

For an assessment of the diagnostic performance of cardiac

markers in the diagnosis of NSTEMI, sensitivity, specificity,

negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value

(PPV) and the accuracy index (AI) of each marker were

calculated according to admission times. Diagnostic sensitivity

was calculated by dividing the number of patients who were

diagnosed with NSTEMI using H-FABP, CK-MB or TnI levels

by the number of patients who were diagnosed with NSTEMI,

as recommended by the ESC/ACC committee.

6

Diagnostic

specificity was calculated by dividing the number of patients

who were diagnosed without NSTEMI using H-FABP, CKMB

or TnI levels by the number of the patients who were diagnosed

without NSTEMI, as recommended by ESC/ACC committee.

6

PPV was calculated as the ratio of the number of patients

with NSTEMI with positive test results to the number of all

patients with positive test results. NPV was calculated as the ratio

of the number of patients without NSTEMI with negative test

results to the number of all patients with negative test results.

Accuracy index was the ratio of the sum of the true-positive

(positive marker and NSTEMI) and true-negative (negative

marker and no NSTEMI) patients to the number of all patients.

The accuracy shows that a cardiac marker can be used as the

criterion for an acceptable diagnostic marker for diagnosis of

MI.

NSTEMI +

NSTEMI –

Test +

a

b

Test –

c

d

Sensitivity

=

​ 

a

______ 

(a + c)

Specificity

=

​ 

d

______ 

(b + d)

PPV

=

​ 

a

______ 

(a + b)

NPV

=

​ 

d

______ 

(c + d)

Accuracy

=

​ 

(a + d)

____________  

(a + b + c + d)

​.