Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  47 / 78 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 47 / 78 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 30, No 1, January/February 2019

AFRICA

45

Intracoronary or intravenous abciximab after aspiration

thrombectomy in patients with STEMI undergoing

primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Ali Bedjaoui, Karima Allal, Mohamed Sofiane Lounes, Chams Eddine Belhadi, Abdelmoumen

Mekarnia, Saber Sediki, Maamar Kara, Adel Azaza, Jean-Jacques Monsuez, Salim Benkhedda

Abstract

Objectives:

To test whether aspiration thrombectomy with

intracoronary (IC) instead of intravenous (IV) administra-

tion of abciximab could reduce the no-reflow phenomenon in

patients undergoing primary percutaneous intervention (PCI)

for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Background:

Despite recanalisation with PCI, failure to restore

microvascular flow may affect the prognosis of patients with

STEMI. A combination of aspiration thrombectomy with IC

abciximab may improve distal perfusion.

Methods:

After aspiration thrombectomy during primary PCI

for STEMI, 160 patients were randomly assigned to either an

IV or IC abciximab bolus delivered through the aspiration

catheter, both followed by a 12-hour IV abciximab infusion.

Results:

ST-segment resolution

70% was achieved in 36 of

78 patients with IC versus 30 of 82 patients with IV abciximab

(46.1 vs 36.6%,

p

=

0.368), and partial resolution in 28 of 78

versus 31 of 82 patients (35.9 vs 37.8%,

p

=

0.368). Post-

procedural myocardial blush grade (MBG) 3 was obtained in

62.8 vs 63.4% (

p

=

0.235) and MBG

2 in 89.7 vs 81.7% (

p

=

0.148) of patients given IC and IV abciximab, respectively.

There were three deaths in each group (3.8%). Major adverse

cardiac events occurred in six of 78 patients given the IC and

seven of 82 patients given the IV abciximab bolus (7.6 vs

8.5%,

p

=

0.410). One stroke occurred in each group, and two

patients in the IC and nine in the IV group developed renal

failure (2.5 vs 10.9 %,

p

=

0.414).

Conclusion:

IC versus IV abciximab did not enhance myocar-

dial reperfusion in non-selected patients with STEMI under-

going primary PCI after aspiration thrombectomy had

successfully been performed.

Keywords:

myocardial infarction, primary percutaneous inter-

vention, aspiration thrombectomy, abciximab

Submitted 25/5/18, accepted 31/10/18

Published online 20/11/18

Cardiovasc J Afr

2019;

30

: 45–51

www.cvja.co.za

DOI: 10.5830/CVJA-2018-063

Rapid and sustained restoration of a thrombolysis in myocardial

infarction (TIMI) 3 anterograde flow through the epicardial

coronary artery, associated with a resolution of ST-segment

elevation

>

70% within 90 minutes are the primary goals of the

current treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

(STEMI).

1-3

Despite mechanical recanalisation of the occluded

artery with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

and aggressive antithrombotic therapy directed at preventing

thrombus growth and mitigating distal embolisation, these goals

are not reached in many instances.

A major limitation of primary PCI is the possibility of

distal embolisation of thrombus and failure to restore flow at

the microvascular level. ST-segment elevation persists in more

than 40% of cases of patients in whom a TIMI 3 flow has

been achieved by primary PCI, a drawback associated with

subsequent impairment of left ventricular (LV) function and a

worse prognosis.

4-6

Over the past decade, several approaches have been directed

to prevent or reverse the no-reflow phenomenon, including

aspiration thrombectomy

7-11

and intracoronary glycoprotein IIb/

IIIa inhibitor administration, such as abciximab.

12-17

Abciximab,

the Fab fragment of the chimeric human–murine monoclonal

antibody 7E3, binds to the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor of

human platelets and inhibits platelet aggregation. However,

randomised trials of both thrombus aspiration and intracoronary

(IC) versus intravenous (IV) abciximab administration have

shown inconsistent results of these adjunctive methods with

regard to clinical outcomes as well as to surrogate reperfusion

parameters.

In addition, these two approaches have been compared to

each other in the INFUSE-AMI study, in which intralesional

abciximab was delivered through a dedicated infusion

catheter consisting of a microporous balloon (ClearWay RX).

Cardiology Oncology Research Collaborative Group

(CORCG), Faculty of Medicine, Benyoucef Benkhedda

University, Algiers, Algeria

Ali Bedjaoui, MD

Salim Benkhedda, MD, PhD

Department of Cardiology, Hôpital Central de l’Armée Ain

Naadja, Algiers, Algeria

Ali Bedjaoui, MD

Karima Allal, MD

Mohamed Sofiane Lounes, MD

Chams Eddine Belhadi, MD

Abdelmoumen Mekarnia, MD

Department of Cardiology, Mustapha University Hospital

Centre, Algiers, Algeria

Saber Sediki, MD

Maamar Kara, MD

Adel Azaza, MD

Salim Benkhedda, MD, PhD

APHP Hôpital R Muret, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Paris,

Seine Saint Denis, Paris, France

Jean-Jacques Monsuez, MD, PhD,

jean-jacques.monsuez@aphp.fr