Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  58 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 58 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 27, No 1, January/February 2016

56

AFRICA

Cardio News

Leadless pacing: an advance in cardiac pacing

In March 2015, Groote Schuur Hospital

(GSH) in Cape Town made history by

becoming the first hospital in Africa, the

Middle East, Central Asia and Turkey to

implant the world’s smallest pacemaker:

the Medtronic Micra

TM

transcatheter

pacing system (TPS). Three patients in

Cape Town had this device successfully

implanted by the GSH team, led by Dr

Ashley Chin, as part of Medtronic’s

global pivotal clinical trial. After nearly

one year of follow up, all three patients’

pacemakers are functioning well with no

pacemaker-related complications.

The Micra

TM

TPS is a leadless pace-

maker that does not require the use of a

lead to connect to the heart. It is one-tenth

the size of a conventional transvenous

pacemaker and is delivered directly into

the heart through a catheter inserted in

the femoral vein. Once positioned, the

pacemaker is securely attached to the right

ventricular wall and can be repositioned

if needed. Attached to the heart via small

tines, the pacemaker delivers electrical

impulses that pace the heart through an

electrode at the end of the device.

Leadless pacemakers were designed to

avoid the need for a pacemaker pocket and

transvenous lead, with the aim of avoiding

lead complications (such as infection,

fracture and displacement), which occur

in a significant proportion of transvenous

pacemakers. Other potential benefits

include shorter procedure times, cosmetic

appeal (no pacemaker scar), shorter recover

times and fewer post-implant restrictions.

Theresultsof thislandmark,multicentre,

international study have recently been

published in the

New England Journal of

Medicine

.

1

The device was successfully

implanted in 719 of 725 patients (99.2%

implant success rate). The primary efficacy

endpoint (a pacing threshold at six months

of < 2 V @ 0.24 msec) was achieved in

96% of patients. Patients with a leadless

pacemaker had fewer complications

compared to a historical cohort of patients

with transvenous pacemakers.

The most frequent complication

included cardiac perforation or effusion

(1.6% of cases), followed by vascular

access problems (0.7% of cases). The

Micra

TM

TPS system has received FDA

approval in the United States and

obtained the CE mark in Europe, and is

globally commercially available.

The Micra

TM

TPS has some limitations.

This leadless pacemaker currently can

only pace the ventricle. This pacemaker

is not ideal for patients who require

atrial pacing (e.g. sick sinus syndrome)

or for younger, active patients with heart

block who require dual-chamber pacing.

Cardiologists will also require training

to implant the Micra

TM

TPS. The costs

are expected to be significantly more

expensive than a conventional pacemaker.

Lastly, the long-termefficacy and safety of

the device is still unknown. Nevertheless,

leadless pacing is a major breakthrough

in the field of cardiac pacing, which is

now proven to be safe and effective in the

short to medium term.

1. Reynolds D, Duray GZ, Omar R, Soejima K,

et

al

. A leadless intracardiac transcatheter pacing

system.

N Engl J Med

2016;

374

: 533–541.