Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  73 / 78 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 73 / 78 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 30, No 1, January/February 2019

AFRICA

e3

Discussion

LV pseudo-aneurysm is the result of myocardial rupture

contained by adherent pericardium or scar tissue, unlike a true

aneurysm, which involves the full thickness of the thin cardiac

wall.

1

The aetiology of pseudo-aneurysm is various, the most

common cause being transmural MI.

2

LV pseudo-aneurysm

may also be found after cardiac surgery, previous chest trauma,

infection or inflammation.

1,3-5

In a study of 290 patients with cardiac pseudo-aneurysm,

clinical presentation was characterised by congestive heart

failure (36%), chest pain (30%) and dyspnoea (25%). However,

over 10% of the aneurysms were asymptomatic and diagnosed

incidentally using various imaging tools.

2

Electrocardiogram and chest X-ray are not sensitive or

specific enough to diagnose LV pseudo-aneurysm. Multiple

diagnostic imaging modalities are useful in the differential

diagnosis. Echocardiography is usually the first imaging modality

to diagnose pseudo-aneurysm because of its wide availability,

non-invasiveness and rapid diagnosis.

Pseudo-aneurysm typically comprises a ratio of

<

0.5 between

the width of the neck and the maximal diameter of the

aneurysmal sac.

6

The presence of colour Doppler flow extending

from the left ventricle to the aneurysmal space through the

narrow neck is another important finding in LV pseudo-

aneurysm.

7

Recently, contrast echocardiography with to-and-fro

flow using a contrast microbubble was used to identify pseudo-

aneurysm. Cardiac CT is another useful non-invasive method

to detect three-dimensional structure, such as location, anatomy

of the aneurysm, myocardium, coronary arteries and bypass

grafts.

8

Recently, a LV coronary angiogram also identified a LV

pseudo-aneurysm with a narrow neck that communicated with

the left ventricle.

9

There are no guidelines for the management of pseudo-

aneurysm due to its rarity. However, early diagnosis and prompt

surgical repair is the treatment of choice because of a high risk

of spontaneous rupture, leading to a poor prognosis.

10

The pseudo-aneurysm in this case was identified four years after

post-infarction VSD patch closure. The patient was asymptomatic

and it was detected incidentally through regular follow-up

echocardiography. The delayed pseudo-aneurysm may have

occurred due to dehiscence of the patch in the friable myocardium,

leading to mechanical rupture of the repaired pericardium.

Conclusion

Because of the rarity of the condition, there are no long-term

data on delayed complications after post-infarction VSD closure.

However, from this case, we highlight the importance of long-

term follow up using multiple imaging modalities.

References

1.

Hulten EA, Blankstein R. Pseudoaneurysms of the heart.

Circulation

2012;

125

: 1920–1925.

2.

Frances C, Romero A, Grady D. Left ventricular pseudoaneurysm.

J

Am Coll Cardiol

1998;

32

: 557–561.

3.

Waller BF, Taliercio CP, Clark M,

et al

. Rupture of the left ventricular

free wall following mitral valve replacement for mitral stenosis: a cause

of complete (fatal) or contained (false aneurysm) cardiac rupture

. Clin

Cardiol

1991;

14

: 341–345.

4.

Ridley PD, Tew P, Patel NC,

et al

. Left ventricular false aneurysm after

previous repair of acquired ventricular septal defect.

Eur J Cardiothorac

Surg

1996;

10

: 68–70.

5.

Ghatak A, Farrer M. Pseudoaneurysm of the left ventricle after repair-

ing a ventricular septal defect complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Heart

2007;

93

: 782.

6.

Gatewood RP, Jr, Nanda NC. Differentiation of left ventricular pseu-

doaneurysm from true aneurysm with two dimensional echocardiogra-

phy.

Am J Cardiol

1980;

46

:8 69–878.

7.

Sutherland GR, Smyllie JH, Roelandt JR. Advantages of colour flow

imaging in the diagnosis of left ventricular pseudoaneurysm.

Br Heart

J

1989;

61

: 59–64.

8.

Niimura H, Mito T, Matsunaga A,

et al

. Left ventricular pseudoa-

neurysm following acute myocardial infarction.

Intern Med

2006;

45

:

1221–1223.

9.

Yeo TC, Malouf JF, Oh JK,

et al

. Clinical profile and outcome in 52

patients with cardiac pseudoaneurysm.

Ann Intern Med

1998;

128

:

299–305.

10. Eren E, Bozbuga N, Toker ME,

et al

. Surgical treatment of post-

infarction left ventricular pseudoaneurysm: a two-decade experience.

Tex Heart Inst J

2007;

34

: 47–51.

Fig. 5.

Intra-operative photograph (surgeon’s view) reveals

the 1-cm-diameter perforation. The arrow indicates

the perforation, which was the point of communication

with the pseudo-aneurysm.